insights

Nov 21, 2025

Mackisen

Capital Gains vs. Business Income – Why It Matters: A Complete Guide by a Montreal CPA Firm Near You

Understanding the difference between capital gains and business income is one of the

most important tax issues for Canadians who trade stocks, flip houses, buy and sell

cryptocurrencies, or engage in frequent investment transactions. The distinction matters

because capital gains are taxed far more favorably than business income. Only 50% of

a capital gain is taxable, while 100% of business income is taxable. Many taxpayers

assume their gains qualify as capital gains because they consider themselves

“investors,” but CRA often reclassifies profits as business income when trading

becomes frequent or profit-driven. Misunderstanding the rules can result in large

reassessments, penalties, denied losses, and unexpected tax burdens. This guide

explains the difference between capital gains vs business income, how CRA decides

which category applies, and the tax consequences of each classification.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

The distinction between capital gains and business income is not defined by a single

rule but by legal principles developed through the Income Tax Act and decades of tax

jurisprudence. Section 38 of the Income Tax Act taxes capital gains at the 50% inclusion

rate, while business income falls under section 9 and is fully taxable. CRA uses the

“adventure or concern in the nature of trade” test to determine whether a transaction

constitutes business income. Factors include frequency of transactions, intention at the

time of purchase, time spent analyzing markets, use of leverage, and whether the

taxpayer relies on investment profits as a source of income. Real estate “flipping” rules

apply when a property is bought with the intention of resale, in which case all profits are

business income. Cryptocurrency trading is also subject to CRA classification based on

facts. These legal foundations govern how CRA distinguishes capital gains vs business

income.

Key Court Decisions

Several major court cases define the rules distinguishing capital gains and business

income. In Friesen v. Canada, the Supreme Court confirmed that a gain is business

income if the taxpayer intended to resell the property for profit, regardless of how long it

was held. In Happy Valley Farms Ltd. v. Canada, the court held that frequent buying and

selling of property, combined with speculative intent, transformed what was claimed as

capital gains into business income. In Fortino v. Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal

ruled that a high-frequency trader who engaged in dozens of transactions per day was

carrying on a trading business, making all profits fully taxable as business income.

These cases establish the legal framework that CRA uses when determining whether a

taxpayer’s profits are capital gains vs business income.

Why CRA Targets This Issue

CRA specifically targets capital gains vs business income issues because the tax

difference is substantial. If CRA can reclassify a taxpayer’s capital gains as business

income, the government collects significantly more tax. CRA monitors high-frequency

trading activity, real estate flips, cryptocurrency transactions, and situations where

taxpayers operate like professional traders. CRA also uses third-party information such

as real estate registry data, cryptocurrency exchange reports, and broker statements to

identify potential business activity. Another area CRA targets is taxpayers who claim

business losses on transactions that CRA believes should be capital in nature. Because

misclassification is common and the financial stakes are high, CRA actively audits these

cases. Understanding CRA’s criteria is essential to avoid reassessment.

Mackisen Strategy

At Mackisen CPA Montreal, we help clients ensure their investment gains are correctly

classified, protect them from CRA reclassification, and minimize tax exposure. Our

process begins with a detailed review of trading patterns, transaction volumes, holding

periods, financing arrangements, and the taxpayer’s stated intention. We determine

whether the facts support capital gains treatment or whether the activity resembles

business income. For real estate clients, we evaluate intention, occupancy history,

renovation activity, financing structure, and timelines to determine whether a sale

qualifies as capital or business. For crypto investors, we review wallet activity, frequency

of trades, and liquidity patterns. When clients are at risk of being reclassified, we

prepare documentation supporting their investor profile. If CRA reassesses, we respond

with legal arguments based on case law and detailed factual analysis. Our strategy

ensures clients remain compliant while keeping more of their profits.

Real Client Experience

A client involved in frequent day trading received a reassessment where CRA classified

all their gains as business income. After analyzing their trading records, we

demonstrated that the client executed trades irregularly, used no leverage, and earned

the majority of income from employment—not trading. We filed a detailed objection, and

CRA reversed the classification. Another client flipped a condo and claimed the profit as

a capital gain. CRA argued it was business income because the client had renovated

the property extensively. We gathered purchase documents, tenancy records, and proof

of long-term occupancy, successfully supporting the capital gain treatment. In another

case, a crypto trader had thousands of micro-transactions. We helped them rebuild

records and determine which were capital gains and which constituted business

income. These cases show how complex and fact-specific these classifications can be.

Common Questions

Taxpayers frequently ask how many trades per year trigger business income treatment.

There is no fixed number; CRA looks at intention, frequency, knowledge, and behaviour.

Another common question involves real estate flips. If a property is purchased with the

primary goal of resale, the profit is business income, even if the property was held

briefly. Many ask whether losses are treated differently. Capital losses can only offset

capital gains, while business losses can offset other income. Some taxpayers wonder

whether CRA reviews crypto differently. CRA uses the same framework but focuses on

trading frequency and commercial behaviour. These questions highlight why

understanding the difference between capital gains vs business income is essential for

accurate tax filing.

Why Mackisen

With more than 35 years of combined CPA experience, Mackisen CPA Montreal helps

Canadians stay compliant while recovering the taxes they’re entitled to. Whether you

are buying investments, flipping real estate, trading cryptocurrency, or day trading

stocks, our expert team ensures precision, transparency, and protection from audit risk

when navigating capital gains vs business income classification.

All-in-One Accounting, Tax, Audit, Legal & Financing Solutions for Your Business

Are you ready to feel the difference?

Have questions or need expert accounting assistance? We're here to help.

Let’s Stay In Touch

Follow us on LinkedIn for updates, tips, and insights into the world of accounting.

Terms & conditionsPrivacy PolicyService PolicyCookie Policy

@ Copyright Mackisen Consultation Inc. 2010 – 2024. •  All Rights Reserved.

© 1990-2024. See Terms of Use for more information.

Mackisen refers to Mackisen Global Limited (“MGL”) and its global network of member firms and associated entities collectively constituting the “Mackisen organization.” MGL, alternatively known as “Mackisen Global,” operates as distinct and independent legal entities in conjunction with its member firms and related entities. These entities function autonomously, lacking the legal authority to obligate or bind each other in transactions with third parties. Each MGL member firm and its associated entity assumes exclusive legal accountability for its actions and oversights, explicitly disclaiming any responsibility or liability for other entities within the Mackisen Organization. It is of legal significance to underscore that MGL itself refrains from rendering services to clients.