Insights

Oct 25, 2025

Mackisen

CRA Gross Negligence Penalty Defense 2025 — Eliminate 50% Penalties, Prove Good Faith, and Restore Your Financial Integrity

In 2025, CRA’s Gross Negligence Penalty Program is one of the harshest enforcement initiatives in Canadian tax history. CRA now applies 50% penalties on any alleged “false statement or omission,” often without full context or proof of intent. Honest taxpayers, small business owners, and professionals are being accused of gross negligence for simple bookkeeping errors, missed slips, or reliance on bad advice. These penalties destroy trust, credit, and financial stability. At Mackisen CPA Auditors Montreal, we specialize in defending against CRA’s misuse of Section 163(2). Our CPA auditors and tax lawyers investigate every detail of your file, rebuild evidence, and demonstrate that your actions were made in good faith — not negligence. We don’t let CRA label honest mistakes as misconduct — we protect your integrity and your future.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

Income Tax Act (Canada)

  • Section 163(2): Allows CRA to impose 50% gross negligence penalties for false statements or omissions.

  • Section 152(4): Governs reassessment periods extended for alleged misrepresentation — Mackisen limits CRA’s reach.

  • Section 220(3.1): Enables CRA to cancel or reduce penalties and interest under the Taxpayer Relief Program.
    Excise Tax Act (Canada)

  • Section 285: Applies similar penalties for GST/HST filings. Mackisen ensures alignment between corporate and individual audits.
    Tax Administration Act (Quebec)
    Revenu Québec mirrors CRA’s penalty system under provincial law. Mackisen defends both audits simultaneously to ensure total protection.

Key Court Decisions

Guindon v. Canada (2015): Supreme Court ruled that penalties under Section 163(2) require clear proof of intentional or reckless disregard.
Bédard v. The Queen (2022): CRA must demonstrate knowledge of falsehood, not mere carelessness, before applying penalties.
Thibault v. The Queen (2022): Reliance on professional advice is valid defense against gross negligence.
Venne v. The Queen (1984): Honest filing errors cannot be equated to fraud or deliberate omission.
These precedents confirm that CRA must prove deliberate intent to mislead — not simple error or oversight.

Why CRA Imposes Gross Negligence Penalties

CRA uses these penalties to pressure taxpayers and increase compliance revenue. Common 2025 triggers include:

  • Missing T4s, T5s, or foreign income slips.

  • Incorrect deductions or expense claims.

  • Late or inaccurate corporate filings.

  • Reliance on unqualified tax preparers.

  • Repeated reassessments on similar issues.
    CRA assumes intent — Mackisen proves honesty.

Mackisen’s Gross Negligence Penalty Defense Strategy

  1. Penalty Review: Analyze CRA’s assessment and identify procedural or factual errors.

  2. Intent Analysis: Gather proof of good faith, communication with CRA, or reliance on professional advice.

  3. Legal Defense Preparation: Build evidence using financial records, correspondence, and expert testimony.

  4. Formal Objection Filing: Submit a Notice of Objection challenging the legal basis of the penalty.

  5. Relief and Negotiation: Apply under Section 220(3.1) for complete cancellation or reduction of penalties and interest.
    Our defense transforms CRA’s accusations into documented evidence of reasonable conduct.

Real Client Experience

A Montreal entrepreneur was fined $176,000 for “gross negligence” after missing foreign income slips. Mackisen proved full disclosure intent and CRA cancelled all penalties.
A Quebec contractor faced $92,000 in penalties after CRA claimed “false deductions.” Mackisen demonstrated bookkeeping error, not intent, and secured full reversal.

Common Questions

What qualifies as gross negligence? CRA defines it as deliberate or reckless disregard — Mackisen proves your actions were reasonable and non-intentional.
Can CRA penalize me for my accountant’s error? No — Mackisen uses case law to prove you acted in good faith.
Can CRA reverse penalties after they’re issued? Yes — Mackisen files taxpayer relief and objection applications for full cancellation.
Can CRA extend reassessment periods for gross negligence? Only with proof — Mackisen ensures they follow strict legal timelines.

Why Mackisen

At Mackisen CPA Auditors Montreal, we are Canada’s authority in reversing gross negligence penalties. Our integrated team of CPAs and tax lawyers combines legal precision with financial clarity to protect honest taxpayers from unjust punishment. We act fast, argue fearlessly, and win decisively — because honesty deserves defense, not accusation. When CRA calls you negligent, Mackisen calls them to account.
Call Mackisen CPA Auditors Montreal today for your 2025 Gross Negligence Penalty Defense Consultation. The first meeting is free, and your protection starts immediately.

All-in-One Accounting, Tax, Audit, Legal & Financing Solutions for Your Business

Are you ready to feel the difference?

Have questions or need expert accounting assistance? We're here to help.

Let’s Stay In Touch

Follow us on LinkedIn for updates, tips, and insights into the world of accounting.

Terms & conditionsPrivacy PolicyService PolicyCookie Policy

@ Copyright Mackisen Consultation Inc. 2010 – 2024. •  All Rights Reserved.

© 1990-2024. See Terms of Use for more information.

Mackisen refers to Mackisen Global Limited (“MGL”) and its global network of member firms and associated entities collectively constituting the “Mackisen organization.” MGL, alternatively known as “Mackisen Global,” operates as distinct and independent legal entities in conjunction with its member firms and related entities. These entities function autonomously, lacking the legal authority to obligate or bind each other in transactions with third parties. Each MGL member firm and its associated entity assumes exclusive legal accountability for its actions and oversights, explicitly disclaiming any responsibility or liability for other entities within the Mackisen Organization. It is of legal significance to underscore that MGL itself refrains from rendering services to clients.